Mumbai’s dropped catches were cancelled away by the run-out chances missed by the Chennai Super Kings, and that is how the game of cricket proceeds. Many believe that withholding Kieron Pollard is the one main reason why Mumbai Indians went down in the IPL finals, a match they were widely expected to win. It is true he came out to bat a bit later in the day but his huge strokes, getting 27 runs off 10 balls, in a way justified his coming.

The thinking behind his demotion being that the Mumbai side wanted to have as long a batting order as possible in chasing down the 160-plus target. That explains why Harbhajan and Abhishek Nayar were sent up the order whereas the more solid and destructive batsmen were kept for later. In keeping Pollard waiting was not the mistake but demoting Saurabh Tiwary and Ambati Rayudu was the one wrong that couldn’t be undone.

You see this team has marched on to the top position in the league thanks largely to the efforts of these two young men. Tiwary has scored 419 runs in 16 games while Rayudu got 356 runs in 14 games. More importantly though, if we compare from the last two seasons we find that the stability these two brought in the middle order was missing earlier. The onus of scoring runs for the previous two seasons lay squarely on Sachin and Sanath Jayasuriya, and the management experimented with a plethora of players – Robin Uthappa, Manish Pandey, Dwayne Smith, Ashwell Prince, Loots Bosman, Mohammad Ashraful, Graham Napier and Luke Ronchi. None of them could do what Tiwary and Rayudu have done this year. They even tried Shikhar Dhawan at one-down last year but he didn’t really excite any one before getting up to the opener’s slot as Jayasuriya began to fade.

It is in their fearless manner that they have provided the solidity to the Mumbai team and that is what was missing during the run-chase in the final. And that is where one also wants to point out where Sachin Tendulkar might have missed a trick to overcome his captaincy ghosts. A cricket writer friend of mine suggested that the reason why Sachin wasn’t as successful as captain is because he didn’t have quality players in the side like his successor Sourav Ganguly did. This is also a thought I have come across quite a lot during the research of my upcoming book on India’s greatest captains.

However true that might be, captaincy is an adventurous art that belies the surety of talent that Sachin Tendulkar possesses. It is the trait of people like Ganguly and MS Dhoni who know they are fallible and keep failure as a viable option. For Sachin that is not the case. It was written large on his face even as he tried hard to get runs with one hand. He orchestrated the batting order without any flexibility of situation which is quite ironical since he first changed the line-up keeping in mind the situation and that is what ultimately cost them the win, and not Pollard coming in late.

Yes, for all his achievements and great plays Sachin once again found out that cricket as a sport can be cruel, but didn’t we know that already?